Skip to content
The Hoover FileSee the list
← Back to the list
SettledPublic SafetyCONFIRMED

The E.J. Bradford case ended in judgment for the city

The federal case over the 2018 police killing of E.J. Bradford Jr. at the Riverchase Galleria ended in a published appellate ruling for the city and the officer, with no settlement and no damages paid at any stage.

Where it stands

Settled

Hits residents

8/10

Years covered

2018–2025

Sources

3 linked

$0
Damages paid to the Bradford family at any stage

As of 2025-05

5 seconds
Between the first gunshots and Officer Alexander’s shot, per the appellate opinion

As of 2025-04

6.5 years
From the shooting to the final appellate mandate

As of 2025-05

What happened

On Thanksgiving night 2018, Hoover Officer David Alexander shot and killed Emantic “E.J.” Fitzgerald Bradford Jr. at the Riverchase Galleria. The Eleventh Circuit’s published opinion records that Alexander fired approximately five seconds after hearing the initial gunshots from an unrelated altercation, without issuing a verbal warning, “mistakenly believing he was going to shoot the two men who were near the railing.” The court described Bradford as “a Good Samaritan who was going toward the sound of gunshots and was legally authorized to carry his gun.” The Alabama Attorney General declined to charge Alexander in February 2019. Bradford’s mother, April Pipkins, sued in November 2019. The district court granted summary judgment for all defendants in February 2023, and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed on April 17, 2025, holding the use of force objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and a verbal warning not feasible. The mandate issued May 16, 2025. No settlement was reached and no damages were paid.

Timeline

  1. Officer David Alexander shot and killed Bradford at the Galleria about five seconds after the first gunshots from an unrelated dispute.

    Eleventh Circuit published opinion, No. 23-10814 (media.ca11.uscourts.gov)
  2. Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall concluded Alexander did not commit a crime under Alabama law.

    Alabama Attorney General’s Office (alabamaag.gov)
  3. April Pipkins filed suit against the city, Alexander, and the mall’s owner and operator in federal court.

    CourtListener / RECAP docket 18352921 (courtlistener.com)
  4. District court entered final judgment for all defendants.

    CourtListener / RECAP (courtlistener.com)
  5. Eleventh Circuit affirmed in a published opinion, holding the shooting was constitutionally reasonable.

    Eleventh Circuit opinion, No. 23-10814 (media.ca11.uscourts.gov)
  6. Mandate issued; no further docket activity followed.

    CourtListener / RECAP (courtlistener.com)

Who's involved

  • April Pipkins

    Plaintiff; Bradford’s mother and representative of his estate

  • Officer David Alexander

    Hoover police officer who fired the shot

  • Hoover Mall Ltd. and Brookfield Asset Management

    Owner and operator of the Galleria; dismissed from the state-law claims

  • Judges Jordan, Newsom and Brasher

    Eleventh Circuit panel

  • Steve Marshall

    Alabama Attorney General; declined to charge

The other side

The Eleventh Circuit resolved the case in the city’s favor, holding that Officer Alexander’s use of deadly force was objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and that a verbal warning was not feasible in the circumstances. The same opinion records that an expert for the plaintiff had called the failure to warn “unreasonable, tactically unsound, and contrary to generally accepted police practices.” No Hoover official is on record disputing the outcome.

Open questions

  • Whether Officer Alexander’s employment status with Hoover PD has changed since the shooting is not documented in any source reviewed.
  • Whether Hoover PD changed its use-of-force or warning policy after the shooting is not documented.
  • Whether a petition for certiorari was filed after the May 2025 mandate could not be confirmed.

Sources (3)